Skip to Content
DataCards 2.2.4 is released πŸŽ‰
DocumentationBest PracticesData Product Architecture

Data Product Architecture

This guide explains how to design and structure data products using DataCards, focusing on architectural principles and composition patterns that make data products effective and maintainable.

What is a Data Product?

A data product is a self-contained system that transforms raw data into actionable insights through interconnected modules. Each module has a specific responsibility and communicates through well-defined interfaces.

Core Principles

  • Modularity: Focused, single-purpose modules that can be developed and maintained independently
  • Composability: Modules designed to work together in different combinations
  • Real-time Reactivity: Automatic response to input changes for live, interactive experiences
  • Clear Data Flow: Explicit, understandable relationships between modules with clear input/output contracts

T-Shaped Knowledge in Data Products

Effective data product development benefits from T-shaped knowledge - team members with deep expertise in one area (the vertical bar) and broad understanding across multiple domains (the horizontal bar). This enables:

  • Domain experts to contribute specialized knowledge while understanding technical constraints
  • Technical specialists to implement solutions while grasping business context
  • Cross-functional collaboration where different expertise areas work together seamlessly
  • Better communication between stakeholders with varying technical backgrounds

Data Product Composition Patterns

1. Sequential Pipeline

Linear flow: Input β†’ Processing β†’ Analysis β†’ Results

  • Use cases: ETL processes, step-by-step workflows
  • Example: Maritime anchoring analysis (ship data β†’ wind analysis β†’ water analysis β†’ safety recommendations)

2. Parallel Processing

Multiple modules process same input simultaneously:

Input β†’ Module A β†’ Results A β†’ Module B β†’ Results B β†’ Module C β†’ Results C
  • Use cases: Multi-dimensional analysis, comparative studies
  • Example: Environmental analysis (wind, water, depth processed in parallel)

3. Convergent Analysis

Multiple sources converge into single analysis:

Input A β†’ Processing A β†˜ Input B β†’ Processing B β†’ Final Analysis β†’ Decision Support Input C β†’ Processing C β†—
  • Use cases: Risk assessment, decision support systems
  • Example: Safety assessment combining environmental forces, anchor capacity, and operational parameters

4. Hierarchical Processing

Layered modules with higher levels consuming lower-level outputs:

  • Level 1: Data Collection
  • Level 2: Basic Processing
  • Level 3: Advanced Analysis
  • Level 4: Strategic Insights

Module Types

Input Modules

  • Purpose: Collect and validate user inputs and external data
  • Key features: Data validation, user interface, external integration, real-time updates

Processing Modules

  • Purpose: Transform and analyze data according to business logic
  • Key features: Data transformation, business rules, algorithms, stateless design

Analysis Modules

  • Purpose: Apply domain-specific analysis and generate insights
  • Key features: Domain expertise, complex algorithms, pattern recognition, ML components

Output Modules

  • Purpose: Present results and recommendations to users
  • Key features: User-friendly visualization, actionable outputs, decision support

Design Principles

  • Single Source of Truth: Each data piece has one authoritative source
  • Explicit Dependencies: Clearly defined and visible module dependencies
  • Loose Coupling: Modules depend on interfaces, not implementations
  • High Cohesion: Each module has a single, well-defined responsibility

Design Patterns

Pipeline Pattern

Sequential: Raw Data β†’ Clean Data β†’ Processed Data β†’ Analyzed Data β†’ Insights

  • Benefits: Easy to understand, clear lineage, simple error handling
  • Trade-offs: Limited flexibility, sequential bottlenecks

Fan-out/Fan-in Pattern

Parallel: Input β†’ [Module A, B, C] β†’ Aggregator β†’ Output

  • Benefits: Parallel processing, modular analysis, flexible composition
  • Trade-offs: Complex coordination, synchronization issues

Event-Driven Pattern

Reactive: Event β†’ Module A β†’ Event β†’ Module B β†’ Event β†’ Module C

  • Benefits: Real-time responsiveness, loose coupling, scalable
  • Trade-offs: Complex event management, difficult debugging

Quality Attributes

  • Reliability: Error handling, data validation, graceful degradation
  • Performance: Efficient processing, responsive UI, scalable architecture
  • Maintainability: Clear boundaries, documented interfaces, testable components
  • Usability: Intuitive UI, clear presentation, actionable insights

Best Practices

  1. Define Clear Interfaces: Well-defined inputs/outputs with clear data contracts
  2. Implement Error Handling: Graceful error handling with meaningful feedback
  3. Use Consistent Naming: Follow consistent patterns for variables, functions, modules
  4. Document Dependencies: Clearly document module requirements and outputs
  5. Design for Testability: Testable in isolation with mock data

Common Anti-patterns to Avoid

  • God Modules: Trying to do too much, becoming unmaintainable
  • Tight Coupling: Over-dependence on internal implementations
  • Data Duplication: Multiple modules maintaining same data in different formats
  • Implicit Dependencies: Hidden dependencies making system fragile
  • Monolithic Processing: All logic in single module without separation of concerns

Conclusion

Effective data products combine solid architectural principles with T-shaped team collaboration:

  • Modular design enables maintainability and reusability
  • Clear data flows make systems understandable and debuggable
  • T-shaped knowledge facilitates effective cross-functional collaboration
  • Well-defined interfaces enable flexible composition and evolution

By following these principles, you can create robust, maintainable data products that provide real value to users.

Last updated on